Level-Funded Health Plans Explained
The hybrid approach that gives small and mid-size employers the benefits of self-funding with the predictability of fully-insured premiums.
Level-funded plans have exploded in popularity, especially among employers with 25-200 employees. They offer a middle path between fully-insured and traditional self-funding—but they're not right for everyone. Here's what brokers need to know.
What is Level-Funding?
Level-funded health insurance is a hybrid approach where employers:
- Pay a fixed monthly amount (like fully-insured)
- Assume some claim risk (like self-funded)
- May receive a refund if claims are low
- Have stop-loss protection for catastrophic claims
Think of it as "self-funding with training wheels." The employer gets exposure to their claims experience without the volatility of traditional self-funding.
How the Monthly Payment Works
A level-funded premium is typically broken into three components:
Level-Funded Premium Components
The Refund Potential
The key appeal of level-funding is the potential surplus refund:
- If claims come in under the expected amount, the employer may receive the difference back
- Refunds typically range from 0% to 50% of the claims fund
- Most carriers offer a "minimum" refund or claims corridor
- Refunds are usually paid 60-90 days after the plan year ends
Important: Not all level-funded plans offer the same refund structure. Some have clawback provisions or refund caps. Read the fine print.
Who is Level-Funding Right For?
Good Candidates
- Healthy groups with low claims history (they'll benefit from the refund potential)
- Groups with 25-200 employees (sweet spot for credibility and risk spread)
- Employers seeking claims data to understand their population
- Groups frustrated with community-rated increases despite low claims
- CFOs who want predictable budgeting but upside potential
Poor Candidates
- Groups with known high claimants (they'll get lasered or face high rates)
- Very small groups (under 15—too volatile)
- Employers who can't handle any risk
- Groups with no interest in claims data or population health
Level-Funded vs. Fully-Insured
| Factor | Fully-Insured | Level-Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Predictability | 100% predictable | Mostly predictable (no additional cost) |
| Refund Potential | None (MLR rebates only) | Yes, if claims are low |
| Claims Data Access | Limited or none | Full access |
| State Premium Taxes | Yes (2-3%) | Often avoided (ERISA) |
| State Mandates | Apply | Often avoided (ERISA) |
| Rating Method | Community rated | Experience rated |
Key Terms to Understand
Lasering
Carriers may "laser" specific high-risk individuals—meaning their claims are excluded from stop-loss coverage or have higher individual deductibles. This is common and expected, but review lasers carefully.
Run-In / Run-Out
These provisions address claims incurred before the plan starts (run-in) or after it ends (run-out). Terminal liability coverage is important for transitions.
Aggregate Corridor
The percentage above expected claims before aggregate stop-loss kicks in (typically 125%). Lower corridors mean more protection but higher premiums.
Questions Brokers Should Ask
- What percentage of the claims fund is potentially refundable?
- Are there any clawback provisions or refund caps?
- What is the specific stop-loss deductible and are any individuals lasered?
- What happens if the employer terminates mid-year?
- Is terminal liability coverage included?
- How are claims reported and how often?
The Broker's Role
Level-funding requires more broker expertise than fully-insured:
- Explaining the funding mechanism to clients
- Analyzing whether the group is a good candidate
- Reviewing stop-loss terms and lasers
- Helping clients use claims data for wellness initiatives
- Managing renewal expectations (good years may be followed by rate increases)
This complexity is also an opportunity—level-funding lets brokers demonstrate value beyond rate shopping.
Key Takeaways
- Level-funding offers the best of both worlds: predictable payments with refund potential
- It works best for healthy groups of 25-200 employees
- Claims data access enables better population health management
- ERISA preemption can avoid state taxes and mandates
- Stop-loss terms and lasers require careful review
- Not every group is a good fit—some are better off fully-insured
Compare All Funding Options
BART helps you model fully-insured, level-funded, and self-funded scenarios side-by-side.